翻訳と辞書 ・ High Street, Glasgow ・ High Street, Hong Kong ・ High Street, Lincoln ・ High Street, Melbourne ・ High Street, Newport, Wales ・ High Street, Oxford ・ High Street, Oxford (painting) ・ High striker ・ High Strung ・ High Sunderland Hall ・ High Survival ・ High Synagogue ・ High Synagogue (Prague) ・ High Synagogue, Kraków ・ High Table ・ High Table Ltd v Horst ・ High Table, Lower Orders ・ High Tatras ・ High tech ・ High tech (disambiguation) ・ High Tech Academy ・ High Tech Academy (Highland Springs, Virginia) ・ High Tech Campus Eindhoven ・ High Tech Gays v. Defense Industrial Security Clearance Office ・ High Tech High ・ High Tech High charter schools ・ High Tech High Chula Vista ・ High Tech High International ・ High Tech High Media Arts ・ High Tech High North County
|
|
High Table Ltd v Horst : ウィキペディア英語版 | High Table Ltd v Horst
''High Table Ltd v Horst'' () (EWCA Civ 2000 ) is a UK labour law case, concerning redundancy. ==Facts== Mrs Christine Horst and two other employees claimed unfair dismissal after being told they were redundant, and failing applications for other positions with High Table Ltd. High Table argued they were redundant because their workplace, which was factually always from 10am to 4pm at City firm Hill Samuel, no longer needed their ‘silver service’ waitressing after the supply contract was renegotiated. She argued that because the staff handbook contained a flexibility clause that said she could be transferred ‘within reasonable daily travelling distance’ where possible she could not be redundant. The Tribunal held that she was redundant, and the employers had not acted unfairly. She appealed, arguing that there had been no reduction in the requirement for employees, because the mobility clause entailed her working anywhere in the City. Therefore her employer had made no redundancies.
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)』 ■ウィキペディアで「High Table Ltd v Horst」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|